On 11/30/2012 3:13 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 10:58:25AM +0100, Steve White wrote:
There was a suggestion that Latin kerns should be activated by
{script,lang}={dflt,dflt}.  Let me ask, should Devanagari kerns also be
activated by {dflt, dflt}?  If not, why?

My own policy is, unless a feature must be restricted to a specific
script/language (e.g. a locale-specific feature), all features should be
assigned to *all* scripts in the font, including DFLT/dflt, because
there is technical reason for doing otherwise and it would help
applications not doing automatic script/language itemisation (both
OpenType-enabled TeX engines, for example).

That makes much sense (unless a font has hundreds of different lookups for multiple features which could slow down basic processing).


                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
    tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net

Reply via email to