Hi Devendra! ···<date: 2013-02-22, Friday>···<from: Devendra Ghate>···
> A slightly more verbose alternative which I have been using is:
>
> \definehead
> [chapter]
> [section]
>
> \setuphead
> [chapter]
> [section]
> [style=\ss]
>
> \setuphead
> [chapter]
> [style=\tfb]
>
> \setuphead
> [section]
> [style=\tfx]
>
> \starttext
> \chapter{Chapter}
> \section{Section}
> \stoptext
>
> Is this not recommended?
With
\definehead[chapter][section]
you set the structurelevel of \section to that of \chapter,
essentially creating a synonym with a slightly different style.
This is guaranteed to mess up your lists (e.g. toc). To verify
that, execute this snippet:
\definehead[chapter][section]
\starttext
\chapter{foo} \section{bar} \chapter{baz}
\stoptext
Observe that \section and \chapter now share a counter.
Btw. to avoid confusion better create your own set of macros
(\definehead[myexperimentalsection][section]) instead of
overriding pre-defined functionality.
Hth
Philipp
--
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
pgpaq2sZ6nzX0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
