···<date: 2013-05-07, Tuesday>···<from: Hans Hagen>···

> On 5/7/2013 1:47 PM, Philipp Gesang wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >the glyph list is a bit of a conundrum.
> >
> >Context (font-enc.lua) will build its glyph list from
> >font-agl.lua and char-def.lua. Luatex-Fonts reads a file named
> >font-age.lua, which is, however, some 500 character definitions
> >short of the canonical Glyph List from Adobe’s resources [1].  On
> >the other hand, font-age contains these definitions
> >
> >   table={
> >     ["SF10000"]=9484, ["SF20000"]=9492, ["SF30000"]=9488,
> >     ["SF40000"]=9496, ["SF50000"]=9532, ["SF60000"]=9516,
> >     ["SF70000"]=9524, ["SF80000"]=9500, ["SF90000"]=9508,
> >     ["afii208"]=8213,
> >   }
> >
> >which Adobe denotes padded as
> >
> >     SF010000;250C
> >     SF020000;2514
> >     SF030000;2510
> >     SF040000;2518
> >     SF050000;253C
> >     SF060000;252C
> >     SF070000;2534
> >     SF080000;251C
> >     SF090000;2524
> >     afii00208;2015
> >
> >I’m not sure what to make of these differences and how they came
> >to pass except for some older posts in the list archive [2]. So
> >I’m asking for practical reasons:
> >
> >   Are the differences of any significance?
> >   Can I use either list or should I stick with font-age?
> 
> only
> 
> twentyhangzhou        5344

that’s 21316, but the new font-age has 12345 -- maybe some
placeholder?

> was missing in char-def
> 
> the rest of the delta with the adobe list are synonyms
> 
> i've added the delta to font-age (makes it bigger but the list is
> not that critical anyway, mostly a fallback)

Okay, thanks!

Philipp

Attachment: pgp3VJCMCFCsX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to