On Thu, 1 Aug 2013 16:01:27 +0200 luigi scarso <luigi.sca...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Aditya Mahajan <adit...@umich.edu> > wrote: > > > > > I think that the advice of omitting the file extension given in > > most LaTeX introductions is more trouble than it is worth in > > ConTeXt. Omitting file extensions is important if you are > > generating both dvi and pdf outputs. In ConTeXt, one never uses the > > DVI output, so I think that one should ALWAYS specify the file > > extension. That removes a lot of headaches with the wrong file > > being sourced. > > > > +1. -1 One might have png, jpeg, pdf, eps and other figure files. The choice of which will be used depends eventually on where the file is to be found... (and setupexternalfigures). This is a *feature*. It has nothing to do with LaTeX. Of course, one can always specify an extension explicitly if one so wishes... Furthermore, the file extension is simply a convenient label which makes no difference whatsoever on any serious system. (but not so on more primitive operating systems. ;) Alan ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
