On 2013-11-22 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
>
> when a single line footnote is used, the footnote divider is
> rendered in larger distance than for footnotes with two or
> more lines (I mean a gap between the line and the footnote text).
>
> It can be tested easily:
>
> \chapter{Chapter}Foo\footnote{Bar}.
> \chapter{Chapter}Foo\footnote{Bar
>
> Bar}.
>
This behaviour seems to be driven by this code in strc-not.mkvi:
\unexpanded\def\normalnoterule
{\ifvmode
\dontleavehmode \blackrule
[\c!color=\noteparameter\c!rulecolor,
\c!width=.2\hsize,
\c!height=\noteparameter\c!rulethickness,
\c!depth=\zeropoint]%
\endgraf
\kern\strutdepth
\fi}
When e.g. \endgraf or \kern\strutdepth lines are commented, the gap is
smaller, but still different.
Changing the depth from \zeropoint to a bigger value (1cm) makes the gap
same, but it leads to extreme thick rule.
What else could be tweaked here?
Thnaks, Jan
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
