2014-02-20 14:52 GMT+01:00 Wolfgang Schuster <schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com>: > > Am 20.02.2014 um 14:45 schrieb Thomas Möbius <kont...@thomasmoebius.de>: > >> A general question. I use setupenumerations to define theorem-, >> lemma-, and definition-environments for my document. I realised that >> setupenumerations is overwriting keys that are set in setupitemize >> (and groups defined by defineitemgroup). >> >> ~~~snip~~~ >> \setupenumerations [numberconversion=numbers] >> >> \starttext >> \startitemize[a] >> \item Text Text >> \item Text Text >> \stopitemize >> \stoptext >> ~~~snip~~~ >> >> vs. >> >> ~~~snip~~~ >> %\setupenumerations [numberconversion=numbers] >> >> \starttext >> \startitemize[a] >> \item Text Text >> \item Text Text >> \stopitemize >> \stoptext >> ~~~snip~~~ >> >> This is unintuitive for me.. Is this expected behavior?? > > What is the problem, I can’t see a difference in the output of both examples? > > Wolfgang
Interesting.. In the first example I see 1. Text Text 2. Text Text in the second, I see a. Text Text b. Text Text I am using the context version from the Ubuntu package manager. % context --version mtx-context | ConTeXt Process Management 0.52 mtx-context | mtx-context | main context file: /usr/share/texmf/tex/contex t/base/context.mkiv mtx-context | current version: 2012.05.30 11:26 Probably, I should update. ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
