On 06/22/2014 02:04 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote: >> On 06/22/2014 10:40 AM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: >>> [...] >>> And if I put a complete distribution into the repository as intended, >>> we could probably set the time limit to a few days ;) >> >> GitHub is then fine. > > No, it's not. They'll kick us out once we start putting gigabytes of > binaries on their site.
I understand their position. Huge binaries in GitHub would make them something different than a git hosting provider. BTW, what is the problem of distributing the huge binaries on CTAN? >>> http://github.com/contextgarden/context >> >> Sorry, I overlooked that this was ConTeXt. > > You couldn't have know it. I have put the repository there after you > asked. And there was not any description there earlier. I thought I hadn’t read a description, but I tend not to trust my memory too much ;-). If you allow me a suggestion for GitHub I’d remove the issue tracker on both repositories. Pablo -- http://www.ousia.tk ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
