On 2014-06-25 19:34, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 26.06.2014 um 01:19 schrieb Rik Kabel <cont...@rik.users.panix.com>:
Adding \obeylines as Wolfgang indicated did not resolve the issue with my test
case (shortened below), while removing #5 as Hans suggested does resolve it.
There is a difference between
\startFOO
…
\stopFOO
and
\startFOO … \stopFOO
because context gobbles only content in the same line as \startFOO when you add
\obeylines and in the first case there is nothing which can be removed.
Wolfgang
Thank you, Wolfgang, for the explanation.
When I use
\startTest
\TestText
\stopTest
or
\startTest
\TestText\stopTest
it does indeed work with the obeylines fix. It fails on the one-line
version and also on
\startTest\TestText
\stopTest
I have no problem using the multi-line versions. I only reduced it to a
single line in preparing the MWE. I have, however, seen such one-line
incantations in other examples on the list and possibly in the wiki. I
do not recall who wrote them.
I will now leave this to the developers to handle as they see best.
--
Rik
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
