> Am 06.03.2015 um 20:02 schrieb Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl>:
>
> On 3/6/2015 6:42 PM, Fabrice Couvreur wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> Is it possible to change the shape of the dots of macro \periods[n] to
>> be like the dots of macro \definefiller[dots][left=\dontleavehmode,
>> right=\hskip\ZeroPoint\par] ?
>
> % in cont-new.mkiv :
>
> \unprotect
>
> \def\periodsymbol {.}
>
> \unexpanded\def\enco_periods[#1]%
> {\dontleavehmode
> \hbox\bgroup
> \enco_periods_indeed[#1,\periodsymbol,]}
>
> \unexpanded\def\enco_periods_indeed[#1,#2,#3]%
> {\setbox\scratchbox\hbox to \periodswidth{\hss#2\hss}%
> \dorecurse{\iffirstargument#1\else\periodsdefault\fi}{\copy\scratchbox}%
> \egroup}
>
> \protect
>
> test:
>
> \starttext
> \startlines
> x\periods x
> x\periods[10]x
> x\periods[10,{,}]x
> x\periods[10,{!}]x
> \stoplines
> \stoptext
Why the weird syntax, something like \periods[n=10,symbol=!] would fit better.
Wolfgang
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
