Re: [NTG-context] Feature request for export: Interactive Notes

Fri, 24 Apr 2015 17:52:52 -0700 

+ attachment
On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 18:36:12 -0600, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد <isha...@colostate.edu> wrote: 


Dear gang,

  I've spent a considerable amount of time over the past month trying to

  master the art of xhtml output. We are close to being able to use  
ConTeXt

  as a replacement for markdown in, e.g., WordPress. Indeed, I plan to

  present the results of this experiment (porting an entire academic  
article

  to xhtml and WP) in a future article for one of the TeX journals...


  There is at least one crucial feature that's still needed. Perhaps it  
is
  already supported: If so, it would be much appreciated if someone  
kindly

  explained how to do it.


  In a web post (or epub), one wants to be able to interact back and  
forth

  with notes. Here is how markdown (extra) does it:

  ========Input========
  That's some text with a footnote.[^1]

  [^1]: And that's the footnote.

        That's the second paragraph of the note.

  More main text
  ========Output========
<p>That's some text with a footnote.<sup id="fnref:1"><a href="#fn:1"
  rel="footnote">1</a></sup></p>
  <p>More main text</p>

  <div class="footnotes">
  <hr />
  <ol>
  <li id="fn:1">
  <p>And that's the footnote.</p>
  <p>That's the second paragraph of the note.&nbsp;<a href="#fnref:1"
  rev="footnote">&#8617;</a></p>
  </li>
  </ol>
  </div>
  =====================


  The resulting html file is attached. '&#8617;' corresponds to U+21A9  
(↩).

  See also

https://michelf.ca/projects/php-markdown/extra/#footnotes


  Now we can of course already export xhtml footnotes from ConTeXt but  
there

  will be no interactive links. In the current project, there are 77

  footnotes; I had to add the links manually to get the output to do  
what we

  wanted.

  [Also note that it makes much more sense to export the footnotes as
  endnotes, particularly for long blog posts.]

  Is there already a way to get done automatically?


  In any case: This feature is a must-do in my humble opinion. Aside  
from a

  few other export bugs, this is one of the few features still needed so
  that ConTeXt can completely replace markdown for (advanced) web posts.
  Thanks is advance and

  Best wishes
  Idris




--
Idris Samawi Hamid, Professor
Department of Philosophy
Colorado State University
Fort Collins, CO 80523
Title: footnote






That's some text with a footnote.1


More main text







    

  1. 

    And that's the footnote.
    

    That's the second paragraph of the note. ↩
    

    2. 









___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________





















					Reply via email to