Hi Hans.
Only for explanation of my (maybe) crazy request:
I can not at this level TeX macros to create, because it creates
automatically after opening the CSV file. Although I tried to start
creating something with \ csname \ endcsname etc. but my experiments
with this method were never successful. In addition with TeX probably I
can not work as well as with Lua (for things which in this case I need
ie. at low level). Given that I have a CSV file loaded in global
variables and header information at my disposal, I Lua everything you
need me to do what I need. The problem is that the macros created in Lua
I sometimes do not work as well when I create TeX (during the cycle will
automatically fall short values). I have a particularly bad experience
in this regard with the construction, he sent Taco.
Simplified version of "interfaces.definecommand" construction does not
in my way of processing the results of what I expected.
Module which at the moment I work (in collaboration with Pablo
Rodriguez) at the moment is very complex and extensive, and already it
slowly begin to lose myself :-), so I try to get any information from
the conference.
Thank you and also to other counselors too at the conference for their
cooperation in solve my problems.
Jaroslav Hajtmar
Dne 8. 7. 2015 v 20:54 Hans Hagen napsal(a):
On 7/8/2015 4:11 PM, Jaroslav Hajtmar wrote:
Thanks Taco very much.
At this point, it really works in simple situations, but in the event
that this solution will incorporate into the existing system, then I
have big problems with expansion (values are not updated in macros). I
need more solutions using something like context.setgvalue, or at least
according to the following example. If they could incorporate the
remaining two definitions
ie
\def\simpleA {content when parameter is missing}
\def\complexA[#1]{parameter #1}
into luacode (probably encounter a problem with #), so it might work.
Can not think of anyone, how it could be done differently?
Thanks Jaroslav Hajtmar
Here is minimal example:
\ctxlua{
xlsname='A'
content='content when parameter is missing'
context([[\definecomplexorsimple\]]..xlsname)
%context([[\def\simple]]..xlsname..[[{]]..content..[[}]])
%context([[\def\complex]]..xlsname..'[#1]'..[[{Neco: #1}]])
}
\def\simpleA {content when parameter is missing}
\def\complexA[#1]{parameter #1}
why don't you define these commands at the tex level
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry
to the Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl /
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
