> On 24 Jul 2015, at 16:29, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote:
>
> On 7/24/2015 4:19 PM, Hans Aberg wrote:
>>
>>>> The function $f: A → B$, $g\colon A → B$.
>>>
>>> we could add a mathsymbol entry but I leave that to Aditya to decide
>>>
>>> {
>>> adobename="colon",
>>> category="po",
>>> cjkwd="na",
>>> description="COLON",
>>> direction="cs",
>>> linebreak="is",
>>> mathclass="relation",
>>> --mathsymbol=0x2236,
>>> unicodeslot=0x3A,
>>> },
>>
>>
>> Should it be 'mathclass=“relation”’? Mathematically, relations have extra
>> space at both sides, whereas in the function $f: A → B$, there should not be
>> much space before the “:”.
>
> that's where the domain would kick in .. it can control that kind of spacing
> issues
OK. The word “relation” makes me think of math relations. :-)
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
