On 8/4/2015 5:46 AM, tala...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Hans, the beta is a solid step forward regarding bidi and Arabic support, and 
not just in footnotes. Thank you.

However, it appears that my earlier declarations of ‘problem solved’ were a bit 
premature.  Footnotes display everything correctly, but not linenumber notes. 
Using the three bidi methods of \setupdirections[bidi]:

- ‘default’ orders the linenumber notes and their texts right-to-left, but any 
number therein is reversed (4102 instead of 2014).

let's first try to get that one right .. new beta coming (also needs testing by idris

- ‘one’ does not render either the note block nor the individual notes' texts 
right-to-left.

i have to rewrite that one using more efficient means (i really need 48 hour sin a day)

- ‘two’ is identical to method ‘one’.

it is .. just a newer version of the unicode bidi one

Compare these to regular footnotes, where everything is rendered correctly as 
of this new beta.

you can trace flagging in default with:

\enabletrackers[typesetters.directions.default]

Hans

-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
    tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
                                             | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to