On 2015-10-23 14:40, Rik Kabel wrote:
At Wolfgang’s request, a new thread for this subject. I have cleaned
up the example from the July 5 posting, but the problems are the same
as shown there. In July Alan suggested that there might a bug here,
but nothing has been done to address it since then. Wolfgang suggested
(http://www.mail-archive.com/ntg-context%40ntg.nl/msg35580.html) that
method=font is required for proper protrusion handling for quotations.
1. When \setupdelimitedtext[quotation][method=font] is present /and
//there is //no citation//in a footnote within a startquotation
block and a bibliography is produced/, compilation proceeds normally.
2. When \setupdelimitedtext[quotation][method=font] is present /and
//there is a citation//in a footnote within a startquotation block
and a bibliography is produced,/ the compilation complains of a
missing right curly. When allowed to continue to completion the
protrusion for the opening quotation marks does not match the
protrusion for similar marks not produced through \startquotation.
Citations in footnotes outside quotation blocks are not a problem.
Without a bibliography (\placelistofpublications)
3. When \setupdelimitedtext[quotation][method=font] is present, the
[right] option of \startblockquotation is treated as text within
the quotation. This can be resolved by adding “leftmargin=” to the
\setupdelimitedtext[quotation] command (but that complicates
matters when you want other alignments). Similarly, the [left] and
[middle] options are ignored as options and appear as text.
4. When “method=font” is not present, protrusion for block quotations
(\startblockquotation … \stopblockquotation) is greater than and
not aligned with other protrusion.
5. When “method=font” is not present, protrusion for non-block
quotations (\quotation{…}) is not done at all.
6. With the older bibliography system, footnotes in citations in
quotation blocks do not cause a halt in compilation.
7. With the older bibliography system, item 3 is still a problem,
that is, method=font appears to be inimical to the left, right,
and middle options for \startblockquotation without regard to the
bibliography system in use.
Further testing shows that the failure to compile issue (#1 and #2
above) is tied to processing @ARTICLE bib entries. The failure occurs in
and out of footnotes and startquotation blocks. I really was too deep
into a wrong view of the problem to see that before. That is pretty
clearly a bug.
The issue with method=font and left, right, middle (#3, #4, #5 above) is
still problematic. This is not tied to the bibliography system.
--
Rik
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
