On 1/18/2016 1:46 PM, Jan U. Hasecke wrote:
Am 18.01.2016 um 11:09 schrieb Hans Hagen:On 1/18/2016 10:16 AM, Jan U. Hasecke wrote:Am 17.01.2016 um 20:05 schrieb Hans Hagen:On 1/16/2016 3:58 PM, Jan U. Hasecke wrote:Am 16.01.2016 um 13:31 schrieb Schmitz Thomas A.:Please provide a minimal example of your problem. It’s impossible to help when we have no clue what you’re doing.Sorry, of course. After setting up a mwe I found that it is a font related issue. When I don't specify a font, it works. --> example.tex When I choose EB Garamond, it does not work. -- example-Garamond.tex I confirmed this behaviour in my real setup.don't assume that ligatures are always real ligatures ... in that font it's just kerning .. this kind of works okay: \replaceword[sellig][auflösen][auf{-}{}{\zwnj}lösen]I am confused as the specimen of EB Garamond mentions (real) ligatures. They are listed as glyphs. https://github.com/georgd/EB-Garamond/blob/master/specimen/Specimen.pdfmaybe the archaic st ligature is a precomposed but f f l i aren't done that way but by either kerning or replacement of individual glyphs + kerning (there are many methods for this) ... also, 'liga' might mean ligature but in practice is used for all kind of things ... in opentype 'ligature substitution' is just a many-to-one replacement but that doesn't mean that 'liga' uses that ... welcome to the inconsistent open type messMh, yes. :-( Two additional questions. Shall I file a bugreport for this issue? What would be the right words: please provide real ligature glyphs instead of composed ones?
there are many fonts out that that do similar things replacing f an i by different shapes, or overlaying, or kerning, or replacing by one char, looking forward (from f to i) or backward (from i to f) ... as all is technically possible/permitted nothing is a bug (but there might be occasional differences between hyphenation although quite some effort went into getting that kind of right ... and it makes a good topic for complex hard to follow boring presentations (see attachment)
(btw, sometimes glyphs get funny non standard names in which case roundtrip copy/paste becomes a mess)
EB Garamond is a free font also in the sense free of charge. But what can I expect when I buy a commercial font? I would be quite annoyed when I buy a font which does not provide the features in a way that I can use them in ConTeXt.
you can expect the same ... in fact you can also expect type1 -> otf converted fonts with hardly any use of opentype features
Is there a font quality page on the Wiki with a feature comparison?
that would be nice (has been discussed)
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.com | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ligatures.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
