On Pon, 2016-01-25 at 22:15 +0100, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > I used ConTeXt once for a presentation, and then came back to Beamer. > Not necessarily because it's better, but I know it quite well, so > I could prepare my slides faster.
Hmm, that's valid point. > So I don't have a lot of experience with ConTeXt, but I'll risk an > opinion: if you're fine with a simple presentation without much > learning, or more learning for a sophisticated presentation, consider > ConTeXt. If you don't mind a bit boring look (which some consider an > advantage) and/or you want just to copy a template from the docs (even > for a bit more sophisticated stuff), try Beamer. Thank you for sharing. > Also, you might want to switch to a decent text editor. ;-P I tried twice, but after noticing wrist pain, I said: "Goodbye!". ;) Sincerely, Gour -- Even the intelligent are bewildered in determining what is action and what is inaction. Now I shall explain to you what action is, knowing which you shall be liberated from all misfortune. ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
