On Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:13:27 +0100 Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote: > btw, imo docs for screen should be designed for screen (or one should > make two versions, one for screen, one for print) and footnotes > should be pop ups or roll-overs but the free acrobat alternatives are > not clever enough for that
As Pablo wrote, this just won't happen. It is very rare that *anyone* delivers both screen and print versions of a PDF file (Pragma ADE excepted). This makes me think: Is there some "standard" way for a PDF to contain both versions? I did struggle recently with an Adobe-specific PDF (which I could not even read using Acroread 9) that contained two, in fact three, documents: 1. A form 2. Instructions 3. A page that was shown on non-Adobe readers I do not know enough about PDF and different readers to know how to include several versions, but this would be quite useful. Alan ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
