On Sat, 25 Jun 2016, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:

Aditya Mahajan <mailto:adit...@umich.edu>
25. Juni 2016 um 18:37
On Sat, 25 Jun 2016, Hans Hagen wrote:


So, to a newcomer, one can suggest to simply use components and environments. What is the advatange of the extra structure provided by product/project?
A product is the book itself while components are only chapters, sections etc. (components can be nested).

Does that mean products cannot be nested?

Even if a component is part of a product, the component must explicitly include all the environments needed for compilation (rather than simply refering to a product, as in the original question). So, I don't structurally see an advantage of the product-component distinction.

Since this is an old mechanism and widely used (though I have never used it), I am missing something. The wiki page is woefully out of date with the current behavior.

Aditya


___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net
archive  : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to