Am 14.10.2016 um 14:16 schrieb luigi scarso: > On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Peter Rolf <indi...@gmx.net> wrote: >> Sigh.. I had high hopes on this one. Would be nice to have a free and >> working (in this combination) validator. I'll make some tests over the >> weekend and contact the author(s). No bug report, no fix. > > I have not said that it's wrong, only that it fails to validate the > pdf..the validator could be ok infact.
True, that conclusion comes from my side. I'm pretty sure that all needed XMP entries are properly set, so chances are high, that the error is on their side. But we will (hopefully) see. Also: If Acrobat isn't right, what tools are left for validation? > Btw, as I can see from > http://www.pdfa.org/2016/08/slide-decks-and-video-recordings-of-the-pdf-days-europe-2016/ > it seems that there is a bit of depression in validating pdf/a files .... > Interesting, but better don't dig too deep... :D ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : firstname.lastname@example.org / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : http://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________