On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 13:14:49 +0100 Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote:
>
> On 11/17/2016 11:21 AM, Christoph Reller wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have the following minimal not-working example:
> >
> > \starttext
> > \startitemize
> > \item One
> > \startmode[modeA]
> > \item Two
> > \startitemize
> > \startmode[modeB] % <- this
> > \item Two A % <- does
> > \stopmode % <- not work
> > % \doifmode{modeB}{\item Two A} % <- this works
> > \item Two B
> > \stopitemize
> > \stopmode
> > \stopitemize
> > \stoptext
> >
> > Note that both modeA and modeB are not defined and hence not enabled.
> > When compiled with the latest version of ConTeXt MkIV, I get: Missing
> > number, treated as zero.
> > However, If I use the inline version \doifmode instead of the
> > environment version \startmode \stopmode, then the example compiles
> > without problem.
> >
> > I am afraid but this may be a bug.
>
> No, just the way tex parses, \stopmode is a delimiter so the inner
> \stopmode ends the outer \startmode.
>
> Using the \doif variable doesn't have that problem.
>
>
Oh, of course! Thank you and sorry for the noise.
Christoph
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
