On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 23:47:00 -0500
Cesar Romani <cesar.rom...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The quality of the rotated pdfs, which are images, drops off a little.
> For example, some characters are not so sharp as in the original pdf.
> If I use GraphicsMagick I would remedy this with the parameter
> -density as in:
> gm convert -density 300x300 original.pdf -rotate 45 rotated.pdf

From the web:

"A PDF file does not have a density anyway. IM will apply a default
interpretation of 72dpi unless you override it (e.g. -density 300x300
-units pixelsperinch)."


convert original.tif -rotate 45 rotated.png

keeps the original density.

1) original.tif was 6000x6000; rotated.png is 8488x8488 (2400dpi)
2) converting to rotated.tif fails
convert: TIFF: negative image positions unsupported rotated.tif @ 
3) converting to rotated.pdf does produce a much reduced resolution image.

Indeed, PDF is container, not the best format for manipulating bitmap images.
I take two approaches to this:
1) I manipulate/modify the images explicitly "upstream" before including them 
in ConTeXt,
   using any of my favorite tools; or
2) I manipulate/modify the images using MetaPost, within ConTeXt.
   This gives very satisfactory results and does not rely on ImageMagik.

If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net

Reply via email to