Hi Mikael, Some time ago, Wolfgang gave a solution which used to work, but I experimented it again when I read your message, and now it does not work anymore… PLease have a look to the files attached (I recovered them from a TimeMachine backup).
Unfortnately the same file typeset with the latest beta, and even with the current version from TeXLIve 2016 does not give anymore the same result. Best regards: OK
closesymbol-1 (original).pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
closesymbol-1 (original).tex
Description: Binary data
> On 20 Mar 2017, at 14:59, Mikael P. Sundqvist <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 7:23 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm bringing up an old question on placing the qedsymbol, or >> closesymbol as it is also called. This was previously discussed in >> https://mailman.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2014/079807.html and the >> purpose of this post is to ask if there is any solution to the problem >> now. Looking at the file below (output is attached), when the proof >> ends with a displayed formula, the closesymbol is located one row >> down. I want it to be (flushright) on the same line as the displayed >> formula. >> >> If I use \placeclosesymbol the closesymbol is indeed put on the >> correct line, but not flushright. >> >> Any ideas? I'm willing to use some command like \placeclosesymbol in >> the occations when the proof ends with a displayed formula. >> >> /Mikael >> >> \defineenumeration[proof][ >> number=no, >> text=Proof, >> headstyle={\it}, >> alternative=serried, >> width=fit, >> closesymbol={$\square$}, >> ] >> >> \starttext >> >> \startproof >> This is a short proof. >> \stopproof >> >> \startproof >> This is another short proof, ending with the formula >> \startformula >> 1+1=2. >> \stopformula >> \stopproof >> >> \startproof >> This is another short proof, ending with the formula >> \startformula >> 1+1=2.\placeclosesymbol >> \stopformula >> \stopproof >> >> >> >> \startproof >> This is a rather advanced proof, ending with formulas >> \startformula >> \startalign >> \NC 1+1 \NC = 2,\NR >> \NC 2+2 \NC = 4.\NR >> \stopalign >> \stopformula >> \stopproof >> >> \startproof >> This is a rather advanced proof, ending with formulas >> \startformula >> \startalign >> \NC 1+1 \NC = 2,\NR >> \NC 2+2 \NC = 4.\placeclosesymbol\NR >> \stopalign >> \stopformula >> \stopproof >> >> \stoptext > > Partly shameful bump. > > Is it even possible? (It is using LaTeX and the \qedhere command) > > Could I provide more information? > > /Mikael > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the > Wiki! > > maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net > archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : [email protected] / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
