On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 8:35 PM, Mathias Schickel <m...@fa.uni-tuebingen.de> wrote: >> 2) The math font looks strange (or should I say different) in the >> ConTeXt example. (Wrong size, scaled?) > > Yeah, this seems to be a bug in the current version. I have observed that, > too. Hans did recently add (due to my suggestion, so thanks again, Hans, even > if this seems to have caused some trouble) support for optical sizes in > fallbacks and I suppose the bug has been introduced there. So at present the > bug occurs that ConTeXt uses the smallest optical size for every symbol > (independent of the size). This results in strange looking mathematics. Maybe > you can fix this, Hans? > > -Mathias > > >> Am 11.05.2017 um 18:51 schrieb Mikael P. Sundqvist <mic...@gmail.com>: >> >> Dear list, >> >> I posted this question on stack exchange >> (https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/369226/52406), and got the suggestion >> that it might be a bug, and therefore I post it here as well: >> >> I have a problem with typesetting derivatives (and latin modern) in >> ConTeXt in latest standalone. >> >> Minimal example: >> >> \starttext >> Compare $u_p''$ and $u''_p$ with $u''$ >> \stoptext >> >> Please see the attached image for the output (here I have also >> included the corresponding output, compiling a similar simple document >> in LaTeX, where things look as I expect.) >> >> Basically, I have two questions: >> >> 1) How should I write derivatives (say second derivatives) in ConTeXt? >> I think that the primes are too far away from each other. In >> particular when the subscript $p$ is there (the first formula). >> >> 2) The math font looks strange (or should I say different) in the >> ConTeXt example. (Wrong size, scaled?) >> >> For a while I thought that the second problem might be because I >> define no font. But the following example gives a similar result. >> >> \definefontfamily[myface][rm][Latin Modern Roman] >> \definefontfamily[myface][mm][Latin Modern Math] >> >> \setupbodyfont[myface] >> >> \starttext >> Compare $u_p''$ and $u''_p$ with $u''$ >> \stoptext >> >> Any ideas? >> >> /Mikael >> <latin-modern.png>___________________________________________________________________________________ >> If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to >> the Wiki! >> >> maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / >> http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context >> webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net >> archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ >> wiki : http://contextgarden.net >> ___________________________________________________________________________________ > > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the > Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net > archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________
Thank you Mathias for your answer! That is most likely the problem! Then we can only wait for Hans to put a new beta out. Hans, will that happen soon? Also, Hans, what is the official ConTeXt-way to write u with double prime and subscript p, as in the example? Should both $u_p''$ and $u''_p$ work? Best regards, Mikael ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
