Am Wed, 12 Jul 2017 11:33:22 +0200 schrieb Hans Hagen: >> (But I don't know if it is really a bug in the font as xelatex with >> harfbuzz has no problems.)
> I don't know what harfbuzz does but the font definitely does some ssty > mapping to rather simple glyphs with no extensible parts so basically > it's a font bug. If xetex catches it, find but it's still a bug. Anyway, > the previous mail with the patch checks for al three 'missing' fields so > this is basically the same issue. If not, let me know. I will check the code in the evening (and also try out if I can inject it in luaotfload). But on the whole I tried to avoid to work around bugs too much - in the end one pay with too complicated code. If it is a font bug then one should try to resolve the issue there. -- Ulrike Fischer http://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/ ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
