On 08/08/2017 09:36 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 8/7/2017 11:03 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
>> But even in that case, numbering from:
>> 1 A
>> 1 B
>> Should it be the following?
>> 1 A
>> 1.1 B
> no it would be 1 and 1.0.1 then
Sorry, I haven’t explained myself, Hans.
With the complete sample:
Being the default and criterium applied, we get:
Isn’t this (again, I mean the default, not the extra option you are
going to implement) a wrong structuring?
I may understand that the original code considers the \subsubsection as
\subsection in regard to numbering to keep the structure, but
considering \subsubsection in the previous sample as a \section in
regard to numbering destroys the structure.
I hope this is clear now.
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
maillist : email@example.com / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net