On 2018-02-18 14:33, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Rik Kabel <mailto:cont...@rik.users.panix.com>
18. Februar 2018 um 20:22
On 2018-02-18 12:07, Alan Braslau wrote:
On Sun, 18 Feb 2018 11:58:40 -0500
Rik Kabel<cont...@rik.users.panix.com> wrote:
Indeed, it is hard to imagine a BibTeX file devoid of such markup.
How would one indicate the (reverse) emphasis of a quoted book title,
as in /The Cambridge Companion to /Ulysses, except by indicating the
emphasis of "Ulysses" and letting ConTeXt reverse it when emphasizing
the complete title? (ยง4.21 of the APA2013 spec requires this.)
title={The Cambridge Companion to {\em Ulysses}},
I would think that the proper form would be
title={The Cambridge Companion to {\it Ulysses}}
since \em could be, and is by default, slanted, but the standard here
calls for italic.
1. How many fonts provides a italic *and* slanted style.
2. You change for the style for \em.
That brings up the question of when one should use \em, \emph, and
\emphasized, all of which appear in font-emp.mkvi. The wiki and other
documentation provides no guidance.
\starttext
normal {\em emphasized}
{\it normal {\em emphasized}}
\stoptext
Wolfgang
It does not matter how many fonts support both (LM does, and Libertine).
One feature of a BibTeX file is reusability for many documents, and when
the file is created you do not know what will be the default emphasis of
the document. By explicitly coding \it, you are assured that the italic
face will be attempted. If it is not available, there should be an error
message, and you can then have a discussion with your editor. The claim
of the new bibliography subsystem is that it will implement APA
strictly, and that calls for italic.
I understand as well that \em allows switching (reverse emphasis as
noted above). It also provides some italic correction. I am asking about
the appropriate use of the two variations of \em: \emph (which is a
grouped command \em) and \emphasized (defined as
\bgroup\em\let\nexttoken). I understand and make use of grouped commands
-- they are largely syntactic sugar, but I like sugar. I am less certain
of the purpose of \emphasized, how it works, and why it might be useful.
I do not recall seeing a command definition with a bgroup and no egroup
before.
--
Rik
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________