On 6/22/2018 9:01 PM, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 08:36:52 -0600, Alan Braslau
<braslau.l...@comcast.net> wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 06:20:45 -0600
Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي حامد <idris.ha...@colostate.edu> wrote:
Many thanks. Question: Is this use of setups now the "official" or
preferred way to handle footnote typography options? On the surface,
it appears to be overkill. For the declaration
\setupdirections[bidi=global]
shouldn't that mean that bidi is applied, well, globally?
The same holds for \setupalign[verytolerant], for example, that does
not get applied to a (figure,table) caption...
These environments (captions, footnotes, ...) inherit their settings
and then live independently.
Many thanks. Is there (Hans? Wolfgang?) available somewhere
1. a complete list of these environments whose typographical settings
are decoupled from the rest of the document?
2. a complete list of those typographical settings (bidi, whitespace,
etc,) which are have to explicitly setup for such environments?
If not, such lists should be compiled in lieu of trial and error -)
long ago i was working with someone on a wrapup of where/how to
use/apply directional layout and bidi and such ... seems to be stalled
forever
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
