Am 2018-06-25 um 14:15 schrieb Hans Hagen <j.ha...@xs4all.nl>: > On 6/24/2018 10:07 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: >> Am 2018-06-24 um 21:57 schrieb Hans Hagen <j.ha...@xs4all.nl>: >>> as there is no index entry blah, humbug or bug ... so you would be fooling >>> your reader >> I understand the rationale, and it could be a nice feature, but we need to >> refer to entries in a different register, e.g. from an index of topics to an >> index of persons, e.g. \seeindex{Pragma}{Hagen, Hans} or to subentries like >> \seeindex{fun+games}{bah+humbug}. Since the latter doesn’t work (or does it >> now?), we use \seeindex{fun+games}{bah/humbug}. > hm, sounds like a crappy index to mee (i actually hate these indexes that > force you to 'see' somplace else .. extra lookup)
I hear you, but it wouldn’t make sense to double-index a lot of terms (it might increase usability, but also double the length of the index). > anyway, i'll add check=no to placeregister so that one can bypass the check > (but i cannot foresee side effects like missing references in interactiev > documents so these have to be taken for granted) Thank you, that fits my/our needs, I guess. Greetlings, Hraban --- https://www.fiee.net http://wiki.contextgarden.net https://www.dreiviertelhaus.de GPG Key ID 1C9B22FD ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________