Am 2018-07-28 um 10:12 schrieb Tomas Hala <tomas.h...@mendelu.cz>: > Hi Hraban, Wolfgang and Hans, > nobody else reacted so I am writing
Better keep this on the list. > Thanks to Hraban for the code and Wolfgang for its revision, it's a good > material how to work with layers, measures (I'll inspire by it) etc. You’re welcome. > 1. Is a ConTeXt layer accepted as a whole in commercial Acrobat, or is it > visible as a heap of small objects? Or is it "only" better for more > comfortable manipulation in ConTeXt? I don’t understand the question. A ConTeXt layer is not a PDF layer. All the objects are manipulatable in Acrobat Pro (or another PDF editor), there’s no grouping on the PDF level. > 2. Is better to write it as much as possible at ConTeXt level (as Hraban or > Wolfgang did), or is better to write it in lua? There is more than dozen > measures... Also more computations are required and they are different > for different kinds of covers (book bindings). I guess it’s a matter of taste. Of course calculations are easier in Lua, but in my image placement macros I struggled a lot with numbers vs. measures/dimensions, regardless if in Lua or on the TeX level. Greetlings, Hraban --- https://www.fiee.net http://wiki.contextgarden.net https://www.dreiviertelhaus.de GPG Key ID 1C9B22FD ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
