On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 4:15 PM Ulrike Fischer <ne...@nililand.de> wrote:
> Am Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:46:57 +0100 schrieb luigi scarso: > > >> ==== > >> A palette entry index value of 0xFFFF is a special case indicating > >> that the text foreground color (defined by a higher-level client) > >> should be used and shall not be treated as actual index into CPAL > >> ColorRecord array. > >> ==== > >> > > > > " the text foreground color (defined by a higher-level client) > > should be used" doesn't mean "you MUST take the current color > > text" or even "you MUST use black" In fact "defined by a > > higher-level client" means that I could define a palette such > > that each glyph marked with 0xFFFF has its own color based on my > > palette --- not necessarily the *same* color. > > Sounds as if there is some room for interpretation ;-). But assume > that I want in my example the 0xFFFF to be interpretated as "the > current text color", so the currently blue glyphs should be black, > and if I add \color[red] before the text they should be red. Can and > if yes how this be setup? (Both in context and in generic) > no, at this moment is fixed, but we are discussing just now how to implement this. -- luigi
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
