On 4/27/2019 12:22 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Hi Hans,

compiling the following sample with LMTX



outputs MKIV.

Wouldn’t LMTX be a better option than LMTX?

Why? Although there are some fundamental differences deep down, the LMTX version has the MKIV functionality. There might be a point where we bind a frozen version of MKIV to LuaTeX, but only when the code base becomes too hybrid to my taste. Of course there will be functionality only available when you use LMTX, but that is something Wolfgang and I need to figure out wrr the interface specification. Also, Alan and I need to deal with in the MetaFun code and documentation. At some point Taco and Mojca might want granularity in the Wiki. We'll see. I have no clue when users will have switched to lmtx for production anyway, as it's not something we want to enforce. (fwfw: I run lmtx by default.)


                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
       tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net

Reply via email to