Hi, list! I've seen the following in Stack Exchange:
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/503208/define-macro-that-scans-ahead-for-super-and-or-subscript-absorbs-them-and-mo
The answer is:
\documentclass{article}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{xparse}
\NewDocumentCommand{\mymathsym}{e{^_}}{%
x^{\mathrm{foo}\IfValueT{#1}{,#1}}_{\mathrm{bar}\IfValueT{#2}{,#2}}%}
\begin{document}
\begin{gather}\mymathsym \\\mymathsym^{\mathrm{extrasup}}
\\\mymathsym_{\mathrm{extrasub}}
\\\mymathsym^{\mathrm{extrasup}}_{\mathrm{extrasub}}
\\\mymathsym_{\mathrm{extrasub}}^{\mathrm{extrasup}} \end{gather}
\end{document}
Such a macro contextually defines a behavior for a subscript and a
superscript even if they aren't displayed in a specific order, so
\mymacro_{a}^{b}
\mymacro^{b}_{a}
have the same output, even if the intended behavior is not the typical
one (I could redefine it so subscripts change colors, for instance).
Although I could just port the macro using xparse-generic because it
works in ConTeXt too, how to define a macro like that the ConTeXt way,
i.e., using only ConTeXt macros?
Thank you in advance.
Jairo :)
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
