Hello list, and developers in particular,
I note that thinrules (and its setup, setupthinrules, and relatives
thinrule and hairline) does not have a width setting, and always sets a
rule (or rules) the full width of the text area (less any text set on
the same line.
No problem, but I do see (non-authoratative) references in the mailing
list to such a parameter, and more problematically, I note that the
default ConTeXt template for Pandoc includes the line:
\setupthinrules[width=15em] % width of horizontal rules
Before reporting an issue to the Pandoc team, I just want to confirm
that this is, in fact, both the case (as reading the source and my
testing indicate) and the intent (which I cannot attest).
I would further suggest that Pandoc should be using setupblackrule with
appropriate height, depth, rulethickness, and width. I suspect that
Pandoc typography is not sensitive to control of the actual placement
relative to the baseline, as ConTeXt supports, but a pointer to a clear
explanation of the interaction of height, depth, and rulethickness would
be welcome.
--
Rik
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
