Hi, Also good reading are the first sections in Roberto’s paper:
http://www.inf.puc-rio.br/~roberto/docs/peg.pdf > > In reality it just means that I was trying to add a new rule to solve > the second part of the puzzle (hidden on the website until you solve > the first part), which read something like > 6: 3 | 3 6 > which would in theory be translated into something like > r6 = lpeg.V"r3" + lpeg.V"r3" * lpeg.V"r6", > if PEGs worked the way I imagined they worked, that is. Apparently they don't > :) Try this, blind guess: r6 = lpeg.V"r3" * lpeg.V”r6” + lpeg.V"r3", Best wishes, Taco Taco Hoekwater Elvenkind BV ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
