08. 01. 2021. u 05:41, Aditya Mahajan piše:
On Fri, 8 Jan 2021, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 1/8/2021 12:39 AM, Vedran Miletić wrote:
It's whatever ConTeXt standalone has. I don't have any extra Lua installed:
--credits should mention the lua version
Should I see it on non-HiDPI as well? Because it seems it's there.
depends on what you consider (non) hdpi ... the positioning of glyphs
depends on font scale, rounding of stems and such (hints in fonts but
these get less relevant with high res displays), caching, inter glyph
corrections (that pdftex/luatex/...) put in the text stream to resync
within certain tolerances, etc ... (often a print is a better reference
as displays are seldom 600+ dpi) .. it's also why often expansion looks
bad on screen because even a sub percentage difference can give such
effects
Another way to see it is just zoom in on the PDF. If the artifacts go away on
zooming in, then they are due to anti-aliasing.
Aditya
Thanks to both of you for the detailed explanations. Printed page shows
no artifacts and neither does PDF.js when the text is zoomed. So it is
an issue with anti-aliasing after all.
I'll report it to PDF.js and see what they tell me.
Regards,
Vedran
--
Vedran Miletić
vedran.miletic.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________
