On 8/13/2021 8:54 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context wrote:


Am 13.08.2021 um 08:43 schrieb Hans Hagen <j.ha...@xs4all.nl>:

On 8/13/2021 12:32 AM, Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context wrote:
Am 13.08.2021 um 00:03 schrieb Hans Hagen via ntg-context <ntg-context@ntg.nl>:

On 8/12/2021 10:01 PM, Jano Kula via ntg-context wrote:
Hello Hraban!
On Thu, Aug 12, 2021, 15:24 Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context <ntg-context@ntg.nl 
<mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl>> wrote:
    Footnotes still don’t work in columnsets (latest LMTX):
    - they stay in one column (I’d prefer them over the whole width of
    the text area)
    - they often get overwritten by main text
    Is there a workaround?
I had to switch back to mkiv. It's on Hans' agenda, but with lots of 
interferencies there will be no quick fix.


good old mkiv ... so it serves a purpose! i would be more worried when you went 
back to mkii
;D
Unfortunately I can’t go back to MkIV with the CG journal since some articles 
use LMTX features.
I’ll probably find some ugly hack to work around the issues...
A lot has to do with defaults. We have several multicolumn mechanisms an cnotes 
themselves can also come in columns and it's nto easy to have a setup that 
suits them all, so each mechanism has additional settings. I'm still not sure 
how to deal with this because there are conflicting demands. So, one ends up in 
'fix this setup' 'break that setup' situations (basically it means that we need 
to setup things on an extra axis: the kind of otr used). It's a bit the price 
we pay for configurability.

Would it be viable to use columnset areas for footnotes? Then the user could 
configure themselves where they should go, how many columns they should span 
etc.
the problem with notes is that the pagebreak depends on them so it is impossible to predict sizes .. it works with ratios and such in basically a one column operation mode (because that is what tex has)

text text text
text text text
text text text
text text text

note
note
note

tex has to split page and notes if needed and take optional distance into account

the lua(meta)tex engine already privides a bit more control but solutions always have to operate with margins

now, if users would accept limitations much is possible but in the end there always a 'i want this note to end up here' demand

the same with figures: if they may float we can do a good job, but designers / publishers (unaware of reliable floating) nearly always demand 'it should end up here' which then conflicts with automated typesetting because 'here' means that one also manually messes with the rest

Hans


-----------------------------------------------------------------
                                          Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
              Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
       tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________________________
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the 
Wiki!

maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
webpage  : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net
archive  : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/
wiki     : http://contextgarden.net
___________________________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to