Simon Pepping ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > It would also help them to maintain the bad habit of always going the > route of the explicit tex document and editing that. Such a bad habit > would turn a process that is fast and efficient, into a process that > is cumbersome and awkward.
I must admit that I don't understand why having tex document is a bad habit? Those who are authoring in ConTeXt (not DocBook) have source file (*.tex) and they can tailor output according to their preferences. Otoh, DocBook document does not say much about the form - it's just a valid structure and therefore there are XSL stylesheets to enable one to customize his/her output. Without that, all the DocBook documents will look the same. So, I don't know what's wrong with the idea to customize the output when going via ConTeXt route :-[ Sincerely, Gour -- Gour [EMAIL PROTECTED] Registered Linux User #278493 _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
