siep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Now I got the file showfont.pdf. I copied the example, but I
> still got a texnansi-lbr missing font. \setupbodyfont didn't work
> either.
> A LaTeX file with \usepackage{lucidabr} and either with or
> without \usepackage{texnansi} works perfectly.
> What assumptions are being made about the way the fonts are
> installed? I have been testing on what is basically a stock tetex
> with lb... pfb's added and with a context from August, and on a
> stock miktex also with with lb... pfb's added.
After I installed the 10-23-2002 version, I couldn't get any of the
postcript fonts to work. So I ended copying all the .afm and .pfb
postscript files into a temporary directory, and running texfont on the
whole bunch. Now they work fine.
I don't have the lucida .pfb or .pfa files installed on my system, so
these fonts won't work until I get the .pfb files (is this right?).
Maybe you should check for the existence of the lucida .pfb files on
your system as a starting point. If you find them, read mtexfont.pdf
and follow the instructions for installing a new font on the lucida font
files. You should be in business then.
I'm just learning myself, and this may be all wrong. Please enlighten
me if so; I find the ConTeXt font system to be difficult to understand,
although it is beginning to make some sense.
--
Larry Stamm
McBride, BC
Canada
http://www.larrystamm.com
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
