>>\def\Flat{\symbol[Flat]}
>>\def\Natural{\symbol[Natural]}
>>\def\Sharp{\symbol[Sharp]}
>>
>>Are there any better ways of doing this?
>
>maybe create a symbol set (did you look in symb-*.tex ?) I think some
>standardization in naming is needed hereI got started by looking at symb-eur.tex. I'll look further for a better approach. >in order to get that working the basic math text font should be euler as >well; Sorry. I don't know what exactly you mean by that. Do you mean manually setting the math roman(?) font to eurm10? > also, you need to code all you numbers in the source as math, so >"about 25 years ago" becomes "about $25$ years ago"; Is this a necessity? I'd prefer my text font's numerals in text, and the math numerals in formulae. > euler was made by >hermann zapf and used in "concrete math" (nice book by knuth cum suis) >combined with concrete romman (afaik no type 1 available) It's a nice font. I found it matched with Charter really well, and after that, found that other people on the net seem to agree with me. I had followed up this email with the attached minimal test. It doesn't give the glyphs I expect. I've tried all sorts of combinations to try to trigger the math symbols in math-eul, but I don't get any closer than this. Cheers, adam -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Adam Lindsay +44(0)1524 594 537 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/computing/users/atl/ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
foo.tex
Description: TeX document
