At 04:04 PM 1/24/2003 +0100, you wrote:
The next release of piechartMP will provide ConTeXt support. In text-mode 1 (SetupText) it will detect ConTeXt automatically, and will use textext instead of current _makeText.
ok
In what sense? You do check duplicate loading yourself, so where is the test needed for (or: what info do you need from context)?Hans, can you give me a hint how i can test that piechartMP is used "inside" ConTeXt? It is not enough to test for the MetaFun macro/variables, since MetaFun can be used without ConTeXt too.
BTW, i would recommend to use piechartMP stand-alone. Currently i'm working on a new release that allows labels to be typeset using ConText. You only have to call MetaPost like: mpost --tex=texexec ...
or texexec --mptex somefile.mp since it does some testing/cleanup on the mp file.
ok, will you also use a namespace prefix (i saw a variable called K which will probably clash with user vars)Since this release features a completely rewritten, key-value-based user-interface it needs still some time to update the documentation.
-)The work-around Hans gave in the previous mail will not work with the new release anymore. So please don't change anything in ConTeXt.
if you need a specific kind of support ...
[btw, i suppose that you're aware of the fact that you can use cmyk colors and transparencies, think of overlapping pies in transparent colors]
Hans
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf
documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
