I believe Guy Worthington said this around Wed, 29 Jan 2003:

>Adam Lindsay wrote:
>
>> I was wondering if anyone else was interested in the Euler math font. I
>> was a bit frustrated in its incomplete coverage of certain symbols (e.g.
>> delimiters, radicals), but then I discovered the Virtual Euler Math
>> fonts/eulervm for LaTeX.
>
>Sounds great.
>
>> Does anyone do enough math typesetting to want to test "zeuler" out?
>> I've gotten good enough results this evening, but I don't have a lot
>> of sophisticated formulae lying around to do a full test. Does anyone
>> have some semi- demanding (non-AMS-territory) math for me to try?
>
>Here's a script used to test the mathtimes fonts: (courtesy of YandY).
>I simply commented out the bits that were giving ConTeXt indigestion.
>It works for me using cm* fonts.

Many thanks, Guy.
The accents (e.g., \qtr) are definitely going to take some work, and the
BoldMath switching is also going to take a bit of learning, but the file
runs very well. Just the sort of thing I was looking for.

Cheers,
adam

--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
 Adam Lindsay                  +44(0)1524 594 537
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/computing/users/atl/
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context

Reply via email to