At 04:23 PM 1/31/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Hans Hagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hello Hans,
>>signature) Hans has very likely a much better way to switch to the
>>samller font. Too bad \tfxxx is not avaliable...
>
> Is there any need for an xxx? it's not that hard to implement that
> (search for !xx in font-ini and you'll see why), but is it worth the
> overhead?
I sure had a look in font-ini.tex :). There is no real need. But if I
know how to get similar results without too many side effects, that
would be fine. I have used \setupbodyfont [small] \tfxx in a local
group. I just don't know if this is OK or not (side effects, you know
:)
\small \tfx is fine and when typefaces are used even not that slow
Hans
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: +31 (0)38 477 53 69 | fax: +31 (0)38 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
information: http://www.pragma-ade.com/roadmap.pdf
documentation: http://www.pragma-ade.com/showcase.pdf
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
