Hans Hagen said this at Fri, 7 Feb 2003 10:48:12 +0100: >>\bTABLE >>\eTABLE > >nevertheless, i would opt for: > >\starttabulate[||i1|i1|i1|i1|] % \starttabulatie >\stoptabulate % \stoptabulatie
Hmm, that's something else I haven't quite understood--the pros and cons of the three TABLE mechanisms. I've only bothered to learn \bTABLE, because it's closest to the HTML tables I already knew well, and because it was advertised as being the most powerful. Could someone who knows more than I do give a brief summary of why I would want either of the two other table mechanisms over the newest TABLE? >(btw, some next release will have an example interface to letters and an >associated database) Hans, is this the same release that will include the "splitting tables over multiple pages" feature you've mentioned? Cheers, adam -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Adam T. Lindsay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Computing Dept, Lancaster University +44(0)1524/594.537 Lancaster, LA1 4YR, UK Fax:+44(0)1524/593.608 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
