I believe Idris S Hamid said this around Thu, 13 Feb 2003:
>I have a more important question for now: Is there an argument to \cite for
>subdivision references? In LaTeX we have, e.g, \cite[p.\~23]{key}. In m-
bib we
>have \cite[key] but no way to include the `p.\~23'. What is the way users of
>m-bib get around this? Is there any way to format subdivision references in
>m-bib?
Actually, Eckhart Guth�hrlein came up with a suggestion a week or so ago
that does this. He had:
\def\citeplus[#1][#2][#3]{%
{%
\setupcite[#1][right={, #3)}]%
\cite[#1][#2]%
}%
}
I simplified it to something like:
\def\citepage[#1][#2]{%
{%
\setupcite[authoryears][right={, #2)}]%
\cite[authoryears][#1]%
}%
}
And it is used something like this:
\citepage[McAd:84][pp.~4--6]
Hope that gives enough of the flavor...
cheers,
adam
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Adam Lindsay +44(0)1524 594 537
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/computing/users/atl/
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
_______________________________________________
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
