Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hello Gary,
> I've installed the default teTeX distribution that comes with Mandrake. > I've installed the latest ConTeXt beta How? Did you copy the new files over the old ones? > I've edited texexec.ini, commenting out the reference to l:/... You shouldn't need to do this. > I've edited ... what was it ... fmtedit?? darn, can't remember, but > I uncommented two lines that refer to cont-en and cont-nl fmtutil --edit? > I've added to PATH: > /usr/share/texmf > /usr/share/texmf/tex/context/base > /usr/share/texmf/tex/context/config Not needed, please don't do so. > I've made cont-en.tex and cont-en.ini executable not needed, as well. > But texexec --pdf filename.tex returns with > sh: line 1: cont-en: command not found > > so cont-en is either not on the path or not executable, right? it does not need to be there. So something else must be wrong. > Please be explicit: > are we talking about cont-en.tex, cont-en.ini, or cont-en.tws? neither nor. We are talking mainly about the executable files texexec, pdfetex and the texexec.ini config file for texexec (so many config files!) > Where is the usual place to put it? Don't know where the usual place is, but I keep my ConTeXt installation separate from the tetex installation, since I like to keep things apart. I changed the config file texmf.cfg and included the ConTeXt path. Nevertheless, it should be possible to install the ConTeXt beta over the tetex installation. > When adding to path, is the shell environment PATH variable what's meant? or > is there some way within ConTeXt to set a path? Yes, no. > What else could be wrong? Please post the output of `texexec --verb' and the output of `kpsewhich cont-en.efmt' and `type texexec'. Patrick _______________________________________________ ntg-context mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context
