On Monday 08 September 2003 12:40, Burton M. Strauss III wrote: > The only thing I've asked you not to report is spurious messages after you > kill ntop. And that's the only report(s) that we're discussing here.
Ok, understood and will never do it again. > The reason for not bothering is simply because - when you use a blunt force > kill, vs. the programmed shutdown - there's no way to prevent problems - > it's inherent in the POSIX threading model. .... > The fallout is that there are some protective messages generated based on > conditions which - during a normal run - would be indicative of a problem. Is included in a 'normal run' the programmed shutdown via the web interface? And is it worth reporting if a thread wil remain using the web-shutdown? Why I'm asking is because in the described case, where ntop stops adding hosts the messages are there during the web-shutdown, too. Btw, the version seems to be quite stable on my systems, too. And the trash traffic generated by tcpsic isn't existing in real life. Good work. Regards Markus _______________________________________________ Ntop-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-dev
