value is defined as 'Counter value', so the proper mask is %llu not %Lu. Otherwise, it seems reasonable provided rrd can parse an llu.
-----Burton > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Markus Rehbach > Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 12:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Ntop-dev] Patch for RRD data ranges (now inline...;-) > > > --- ntop/plugins/rrdPlugin.c 2004-11-01 10:11:11.000000000 +0100 > +++ ntop-dev/plugins/rrdPlugin.c 2004-11-02 > 19:27:19.175459720 +0100 > @@ -1094,7 +1094,7 @@ > if((!createdCounter) && (numRuns == 1)) { > return; > } else { > - safe_snprintf(__FILE__, __LINE__, cmd, sizeof(cmd), "%u:%u", > rrdTime, (unsigned long)value); > + safe_snprintf(__FILE__, __LINE__, cmd, sizeof(cmd), > "%u:%Lu", rrdTime, value); > } > > argv[argc++] = cmd; > > > ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- > > Subject: Patch for RRD data ranges > Date: Tuesday 02 November 2004 19:35 > From: Markus Rehbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi all, > > on my ntop system there was a constant load of ca. 45MByte/s and the RRD > graphs for the ethernet and the ip bytes looked weird (sometimes > zero but my > snmp interface counters told other things). The attached patch > fixes it for > me. > > Cheers > > Markus > > ------------------------------------------------------- > _______________________________________________ > Ntop-dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-dev _______________________________________________ Ntop-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-dev
