okay and what do you think about my other email regarding the
Remote->Remote TCP Sessions and that nonFullyRemoteSession Flag being
set to 0 in pbuf.c??



On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:40:14 -0600, Burton Strauss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Under Linux (at least), promiscuous mode is a bit of a lie.  Whether it's
> set at the hardware level depends upon the driver and the configuration ...
> 
> ifconfig doesn't report from the hardware, it uses the dev->flags value.
> But the actual hardware could be.
> 
> For example, some chips only allow one or two IP addresses for the device.
> If there are more, the driver puts the device into promiscuous mode w/o
> setting the kernel flag.  Thus the ifconfig doesn't report it as promiscuous
> mode, but it is - sort of.  Programs like ntop which use libpcap to hook to
> the device driver see the packets.
> 
> One that I know does this is the via-rhine driver (because this just came up
> @ ExpertsExchange).
> 
> -----Burton
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Farhan Ali Khan
> Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2005 5:07 PM
> To: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Ntop-dev] TCP Sessions
> 
> Hi,
> The ifconfig doesnt seem to be reporting interfaces in promisc mode
> correctly, atleast for ntop, I checked this at two places (one of them
> displays sessions ok).
> I ran NTOP and then ifconfig, and it dint show interfaces in promisc mode.
> NTOP was still catching *all* traffic because I could see the hosts adding
> in the hosts table and ftp data column being incremented except for the fact
> that the session wasnt being shown, so i concluded that NIC was actually in
> promisc mode and ifconfig may not be reporting correctly, but to be sure I
> set the interfaces to promisc mode using "ifconfig eth0 promisc" & "ifconfig
> eth1 promisc", and then it shows them in PROMISC mode forever, without any
> impact on the running of NTOP (i.e. sessions still not display).
> 
> What could be wrong here?
> 
> Thanks
> Regards
> Farhan Ali Khan
> 
> <snip />
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Ntop-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-dev

Reply via email to