Ok, so glibc version is 2.3.2 with some Mandrake specific patches, with
(according to the indications in the sources) linuxthreads 0.7 included.
Florin

On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 00:02, Burton Strauss wrote:
> It's possible - sort of, and in some situations - to figure out which thread
> library is being used and what the version of glibc is.
> 
> The question then becomes whether we can use this information to avoid the
> syslog() wrapping mutex calls if we KNOW that we don't need them.
> 
> 1. The default (including unkown information case) needs to be to use the
> mutex() calls.
> 
> 2. We need to identify the specific case(es) which we know are safe.  And do
> it in such a way that when ntop hits something new, it will handle it
> properly.
> 
> 
> I see a couple of alternatives.
> 
> 1. Reverse the meaning of the -D flag and require explicitly it be present
> in configureextra/ files where we know we can skip the calls, e.g. FC2/3.
> 
> 2. Do some sort of run-time testing.
> 
> 
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> -----Burton 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Florin
> Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 2:59 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Ntop-dev] 3.1 Hang Info (was: SMP linux hangs with ntop)
> 
> Did the ntop part of the hacking and it seems to work, except that it uses
> 99% of CPU 1 (well, kinda, since it's still Pentium 4 HT ).
> Concerning the glibc bug, it seems having been fixed in Mandrake 9.2 in a
> personal way (the patch is present but modified). 
> <snip />
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-dev


_______________________________________________
Ntop-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-dev

Reply via email to