Jonathan
I have forgot to say that the CPU was loaded ~50% when capturing at over 11 
Mpps. This is also important if you plan to do something with these packets 
beside just counting them.

Luca

On May 16, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Luca Deri wrote:

> Hi Jonathan
> 
> On May 16, 2011, at 3:23 PM, Lynch, Jonathan wrote:
> 
>> Hi Luca,
>> 
>> With regard to the ntop blog entry "Packet Capture Performance at 10 Gbit: 
>> PF_RING vs TNAPI", May 10, 2011
>> Do you have a packet drop % at the NIC driver level for each of the 
>> benchmarks? (from rx_missed_errors in ethtool -S or drop from /proc/net/dev)
> 
> You can compute that as we're inject wire rate and getting ~50% of it.
> 
>> 
>> Also im just following up on the 10GbE 82599 DNA driver and wondering how 
>> development is progressing?
>> 
> 
> We're polishing the code. As of today with a low-end Xeon PC you can capture 
> (timestamp and all the rest, no faked tests like you read on some papers) 
> more than 11 Mpps (yes 11 Million packets/sec), but we're confident we can 
> push it even further before the final release. 
> 
> Stay tuned, Luca
> 
>> Regards
>> Jonathan
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>> Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
> 
> ---
> We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we 
> created them - Albert Einstein
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ntop-misc mailing list
> Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it
> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

---
Due to lack of interest, tomorrow is cancelled - Kaiser Chiefs


_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
Ntop-misc@listgateway.unipi.it
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to